David DANN

David married Hannah LOCKWOOD on 17 Sep 1724 in Stamford, Fairfield, Connecticut, USA. Hannah (daughter of Joseph LOCKWOOD and Elizabeth AYRES) was born on 24 Mar 1700/1 in Stamford, Fairfield, Connecticut, USA; died in 1746 in Stamford, Fairfield, Connecticut, USA. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

1. Hannah DANN was born on 23 Sep 1725 in Stamford, Fairfield County, Connecticut.
2. Elizabeth DANN was born on 23 Jul 1727 in Stamford, Fairfield, Connecticut, USA.
3. Deborah DANN was born on 13 Jun 1729 in Stamford, Fairfield, Connecticut, USA.
4. David DANN was born on 09 Jul 1731 in Stamford, Fairfield, Connecticut, USA; died in Poundridge, Westchester, New York, USA.
5. Silas DANN was born on 07 Oct 1733 in Stamford, Fairfield, Connecticut, USA.
6. Jonathan DANN was born on 11 May 1739 in Stamford, Fairfield, Connecticut, USA.
7. Sarah DANN was born on 23 Feb 1740/1 in Stamford, Fairfield, Connecticut, USA.

David married Mercy SCOFIELD about 1749 in Stamford, Fairfield, Connecticut, USA. Mercy (daughter of Joseph SCOFIELD and Eunice BUXTON) was born about 1713; died on 08 Jun 1771. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

1. Squire DANN was born on 08 May 1755 in Stamford, Fairfield County, Connecticut; died on 25 Mar 1839 in Stamford, Fairfield County, Connecticut; was buried in Simsbury Cemetery, Stamford, Fairfield Co., Connecticut.
2. Hannah DANN was born on 17 Jul 1751 in Stamford, Fairfield, Connecticut, USA; died on 10 Jan 1832 in Stamford, Fairfield, Connecticut, USA.
3. Jonathan DANN was born about 1753.

Francis married Elizabeth CLASON on 19 Nov 1685 in Stamford, Fairfield, Connecticut, USA. Elizabeth (daughter of Stephen CLASON and Elizabeth PEREMENT) was born about 1665; died after 1728. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Stephen married Elizabeth PEREMENT on 11 Jan 1654/5 in Stamford, Fairfield Co., Connecticut. Elizabeth was born about 1631; died on 10 May 1714 in Stamford, Fairfield Co., Connecticut. [Group Sheet] [Family Chart]

Notes:

Name:

Elizabeth (Perement) Clason of Stamford, Connecticut, Who Was Tried for Witchcraft, and her Clason Descendants
Harlan R. Jessup

In 1692, at the same time as the witchcraft hysteria in Salem, Massachusetts, Elizabeth Clason and Mercy Disborough were tried as witches at the county seat in Fairfield, Connecticut. The case against Elizabeth has been well documented and is briefly summarized in this article. In a booklet dated 1959, which does not mention the case, Robert W. Carder1 summarized the Clason descendants of Elizabeth and her husband Stephen Clason of Stamford. That family summary, somewhat amended, follows the trial summary.

The Witchcraft Trial of Elizabeth Clason

Katherine Branch, a seventeen-year-old servant of the Clasons?s neighbors Daniel and Abigail Wescot, was subject to convulsive and paralytic seizures, and in the aftermath of several of these she accused Elizabeth, along with Mercy Disborough and several others, of bewitching her. Elizabeth vigorously denied the accusation but acknowledged there had been an ongoing tension between her and Katherine?s mistress, arising from a dispute over the weight of a quantity of spun flax. On another earlier occasion Elizabeth had chastised Mary Newman whose children had stolen some fruit from the Clason orchard. That evening three of the Newman?s sheep had died, and, finding no other cause, some believed them to have been bewitched. In May of 1692 a Court of Inquiry began hearings in Stamford

"Upon ye Information & sorrofull complainte of Serjeant Daniel Wescot in Regard of his maide Servant Katherine Branch whom he suspects to be afflicted pr witchcraft."

While hearings continued, Elizabeth Clason and Mercy Disborough were held in the county jail at Fairfield until the October conclusion of the trial. In June both Elizabeth and Mercy were put to the water test, being bound hand and foot and pushed into a deep pond or millrace where the guilty were expected to float because of the devil?s aversion to water. This test was already being discredited by New England cleric Increase Mather and by others. Elizabeth being

"bownd head & foote & put into the water she swam like a corck & one laboured to pry her into the water & she boyed up like a corck..."

On 4 Jun 1692, in Elizabeth?s defense, some seventy-six of her neighbors and friends signed a petition assuring the court that


"...we have not known her to be of a contentious frame nor giuen to use threatening words or to act maliciously towards her neighbors but hath bene siuil and orderly...and not to be a busybody..."

The special court, headed by Governor Robert Treat, was convened in Fairfield on 14 Sep 1692, and their formal indictment reads in part:

"Elizabeth Clawson is complayned of & accused as Guilty of witchcraft...for that on the 25th of Aprill ...& at sundry other times she hath by the Instigation & help of the divell...afflicted & don harme to the bodye & estates of sundry of [their Majesties?] subjects..."

The court heard evidence for several days, but after long deliberation the jury was unable to reach a conclusion in either case. The court reconvened on 28 October and, after additional testimony and further examination for ?witchmarks,? the jury found Elizabeth not guilty and she was freed, returning to her family in Stamford where she lived another 22 years to age 83. The jury found Mercy Disborough guilty and maintained this conclusion even after reconsideration. Apparently alarmed by the possibility of an execution, Governor Treat appointed a special committee, which reported in May 1693 that they had reprieved Mercy Disborough. Their report admonished against further such trials stating that

"...the miserable toyl they are in in the Bay [Massachusetts] for Adhereing to those last mentioned Litigious things is warning enof, those that wil make witchcraft of such things wil make hanging work apace...."